Kissinger calls on Obama to create a New World Order

Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by I TOOK THE RED PILL on January 6, 2009 at 10:29am

anyone going to comment on this.

▶ Reply to This

Permalink Reply by Jaria on January 6, 2009 at 10:43am

If you look at the war between Israel and Pakistan it is now has it has always been about land, resources and how people, America, deals with their resources and decides they should be doled out. Israel is our ally as they have been since for more then a century and this makes our actions as American's their responsibility in the eyes of Pakistan. the obvious rebuttal to this would be to say "if Pakistan feels that as a whole a governing body should take responsibility for the actions of their state" to this I would have to say that their culture is a very private seclusive culture and you will notice slight changes in the way they treat people 1) the give people more of a chance to see them, which is a very tough thing for them to do 2) They fight along side with their age old enemy's Ally. things like this should be accepted as they are and not over looked. The problem is how do we show Pakistan that our new leader recognize this and wishes to make peace with Pakistan and not further instigate wars that are more about insult then accutualy gaining something?

▶ Reply to This

Permalink Reply by I TOOK THE RED PILL on January 6, 2009 at 11:01am

this comment has noting to do with the title of this post

▶ Reply to This

Permalink Reply by Jaria on January 6, 2009 at 9:34pm

I may be a little off, but I believer Obama's message to be one of peace so I applied the war in Gaza to this situation. forgive I am wrong.

▶ Reply to This

Permalink Reply by Loring Wirbel on January 6, 2009 at 5:15pm

Jaria, how could it have been that way "for more than a century" when the nation of Israel was formed in 1948? For the first few years, Israel was closest to France and the Soviet Union, and did not become a close strategic ally of the U.S. until the early 1960s.

As for the whole Kissinger NWO thing, I don't attach any magical significance to the words "new world order." However, I think Kissinger has had a history of very evil beliefs precisely because of his "real-politick" method of using people and nations in an amoral fashion.

▶ Reply to This

Permalink Reply by Jaria on January 6, 2009 at 9:34pm

In my opinion wars always start because of necessity. either necessity to remind us that of their objectives (fight for what is right in the name of their God) or 2) that they see dishonor in the war that is going on and would like to state their point. I'll be the first to admit I am not up to date on my politics concerning foreign policies, but I can look at the situation and see that it should be tranquilized as soon as possible without any further discourtesies. If we stop one war and let another start, then we are right back where we started.

▶ Reply to This

Permalink Reply by D.J. Coffman on January 6, 2009 at 11:18am

Two things here to play devils advocate. Kissinger said it off hand. He didn't clarify what he meant other than the fact that its a tremendous opportunity for Obama to make great strides in the world because he's so accepted as a world leader.

2, every time the words "New World Order" is said, doesn't necessarily mean the realm of conspiracy theory. I'm sure those were the words on the tip of his tongue though. But Kissinger's vision of an NWO and Obama's vision for how things should work will likely be much much different.

▶ Reply to This

Permalink Reply by I TOOK THE RED PILL on January 6, 2009 at 11:36am

if thats how you want to see it He says just how its. he says there is a deception of obama I worder what he is trying to tell us by saying that. Then he says obama's task is to develop a over lords strategy for America. hey says there are lot of things going on in the world and obama is the answer. The problems are the chaos and obama is the soultuion. its not just a crisis its a opportunity for a new world order I think he ment to say it and he means it in the realm of conspiracy.

▶ Reply to This

Permalink Reply by D.J. Coffman on January 6, 2009 at 11:40am

Well I guess we'll find out soon.

▶ Reply to This